The high-profile POCSO case involving Bandi Bhageerath, the son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs Bandi Sanjay, has taken a significant turn. While SIT (Special Investigation Team) officials and the public expected Bhageerath to appear for questioning at 2:00 PM on Wednesday at the Petbasheerabad Police Station, he remained absent. Instead, he reached out to the authorities via email, requesting a two-day extension to gather evidence for his defense.
Key Highlights from Bhageerath’s Letter
In his formal communication to the SIT, Bhageerath addressed several critical points regarding his stance on the investigation:
-
Commitment to Cooperate: Bhageerath stated that he is fully prepared to cooperate with the SIT investigation and intends to present his side of the story directly to the investigating officer.
-
Request for Time: He argued that the notice provided for the inquiry was too short. Citing personal reasons and the need to gather “crucial evidence, documents, and key testimonies,” he requested an additional 48 hours before appearing.
-
Rebuttal of Allegations: He claimed that the accusations against him and his family are “baseless” and that he possesses vital information that will clear his name during the face-to-face interrogation.
Political and Legal Context
This development comes at a time when the case has become a major talking point in Telangana politics. Recently, posters appeared across Hyderabad questioning the whereabouts of Bhageerath, leading to allegations from opposition parties that he was being shielded from the law.
| Current Legal Status | Details |
| Notice Status | Issued for Wednesday; requested extension to Friday. |
| Legal Action | Bhageerath has moved the High Court for interim bail and to quash the case. |
| SIT Response | Officials are reviewing the request for more time; a new date is yet to be confirmed. |
The “Sensational Evidence” Claim
The most talked-about aspect of the letter is Bhageerath’s claim that he will present “sensational evidence” to the SIT. While he did not specify the nature of this evidence, his supporters suggest it may involve documents that disprove the timeline or nature of the allegations. Meanwhile, the victim’s family and opposition leaders continue to demand a swift and transparent investigation, urging the police not to allow any delays that could potentially compromise the case.
